Cutting wages is an attempt to save the jobs, would save your money also and is less painful than layoffs. But only few companies take into consideration such alternatives. The idea of handling the need to cut cost by certain alternatives is very old method.
The term layoff in those days means temporary job losses. Unionized as well as non-union workers, would get supplement benefits at the time of layoff, just to retain them and keep them away from other jobs. As the situation becomes good, the companies wanted to take back there old employees as fast as possible.
Rehiring is done on the basis of high status, make sure that the high experienced workers should remain with the company. This ofcourse help the company to pick up fast, and cost of hiring and training is saved.
After the recession of 1981, the term layoff shifted from temporary job loss in which they expect the call from their company with no prospects for recall. The most outstanding factor of these alternative approaches was wage cut, they also negotiate by union, but the aim behind that is only one i.e, to reduce permanent job losses.
The options under these alternatives are interesting—reducing working hours and pay, same job will be split between two people, reducing the outsourcing work and the use of vendor is no longer needed etc.
Giving slope to the current downturn, it is nothing new that a lot of attention is given towards the layoffs and their alternatives. But further there are some evidence which need to keep the workforce together by avoiding layoffs and is more important at this stage compared to past.
One reason behind that is many companies just struggle few years to recruit and retain the employees they need. The second reason is that all the liquidity of the government is moved into the market.